There is a piece of paper that can now decide whether you sleep in your own bed tonight or on a plane out of the country. It is proof that you have lived in the United States for two years. Until recently, most people never had to think about carrying it. That changed on July 17, 2026, when a court order cleared the way for the government to enforce a nationwide designation. The litigation behind it is still going.
On June 23, 2026, the United States Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit handed the government a major win in a case called Make the Road New York v. Mullin, No. 25-5320. A panel held that the district court order blocking the government from using fast-track deportation, called expedited removal, across the interior of the country should be vacated. The chronology matters here. On the same day it ruled, the court withheld its mandate, so nothing changed right away and the district court order stayed in force. The panel then stayed that order on July 17, 2026, and that is the date from which the government has been able to enforce the nationwide designation. For years that fast track was used mainly at and near the border. As things stand now, an officer may use it against someone picked up in a parking lot in Queens, outside a courthouse in Newark, or at a check-in in an office hundreds of miles from any border. Status as of September 17, 2026: this is not settled law. The D.C. Circuit has still not issued its mandate, and the plaintiffs' petition for rehearing before the full court, filed July 27, 2026, has not been decided. If the full court takes the case, the panel decision could be reopened, so check where things stand before you rely on any of this.
If you or someone you love is undocumented, this is the most important practical change in immigration enforcement in a long time. The good news is that there is a concrete, doable thing you can do about it this week. Let us walk through it.
What "expedited removal" actually means
Most people imagine deportation as a long process. You get a notice, you get a court date, you stand before an immigration judge, you have a chance to ask for relief. That picture is still true for many people. Expedited removal is the exception, and it is brutal in its speed.
Under the statute, found at INA section 235(b)(1) and 8 U.S.C. section 1225(b)(1), a single immigration officer can order a person removed. There is normally no hearing in front of a judge. There is no bond hearing. There is often no real chance to gather documents or reach a lawyer before the order is signed. Congress wrote this tool in 1996 for people caught right at the border who had just arrived. The fight in Make the Road was about how far into the country, and how far back in time, the government could stretch it.
Start with who this reaches, because that comes first and most coverage skips it. Describing the statute, the court explained that expedited removal reaches those "already in the United States who were not admitted or paroled and who cannot show continuous physical presence for at least two years, if the Secretary of Homeland Security so designates." Read the first half of that sentence carefully. If you were admitted or paroled at a port of entry, this designation does not reach you, even if you overstayed a visa and even if you have been here less than two years. The same is true if you are a U.S. citizen, a lawful permanent resident, a refugee, or an asylee. The opinion lists those claims, and the regulations let you present evidence to support them. Only once you are past that threshold does the two-year question matter. It is also worth being precise about what the court did and did not decide. That sentence is the opinion's background description of the statute, not its holding. What the panel actually ruled was that the plaintiffs had not shown they were likely to succeed on the merits of their due process claim, which is the standard for interim relief, so the interim relief should not stand. The court did not rule that the designation is lawful. The rule itself comes from a Federal Register notice, "Designating Aliens for Expedited Removal," 90 Fed. Reg. 8,139 (Jan. 24, 2025), which reaches people encountered more than 100 air miles from a land border who have been here less than two years, and people encountered within 100 air miles who have been here at least 14 days but less than two years.
Why two years is suddenly the most important number in your life
Think about what that rule does. It puts the burden on you. If the designation applies to you at all, and an officer questions you and you cannot demonstrate that you have been physically present in the United States for at least two years, you risk being treated as someone who can be removed on the spot, without ever seeing a judge. So say the threshold facts out loud first if they are true for you: that you were admitted or paroled, or that you are a citizen, a permanent resident, a refugee, or an asylee. Those claims put you outside this designation no matter how long you have been here.
This is exactly the kind of moment where the real competition for your attention is not a lawyer. It is the voice that says do nothing and hope ICE never knocks. It is the cousin who heard something secondhand. It is a post in a Facebook group written with total confidence and zero accuracy. Every one of those options feels easier today and costs you everything on the day an officer stops you. The honest path is less comfortable and far safer. Get your proof in order now, before you need it.
What actually counts as proof, in concrete terms
People hear "prove two years" and freeze, because it sounds like a legal mountain. It is not. It is a paper trail, and most people already have more of it than they think.
What you want is documentation that ties your physical presence to specific dates stretching back at least two years, ideally longer. A lease, rent receipts, or letters from a landlord show where you have been living. Pay stubs, an employer letter, or tax returns show work over time. School enrollment and report cards for your children, and medical or dental records for anyone in the family, are powerful because they are dated and hard to fake. Dated utility bills, phone bills, bank statements, and money transfer receipts all add links to the chain. Even a consistent stream of dated photos with location information can help.
You do not need every one of these. You want enough dated records, spread across the months, to make the strongest showing you can of two years of continuous presence. Gather them now. Make at least two copies. Keep one set somewhere safe at home and leave another with a trusted friend or family member who is not at risk, so the documents survive even if you are detained. Consider keeping a simple summary in your wallet or phone with the names and numbers of your lawyer and your emergency contact.
What to do in the moment an officer stops you
Knowing your rights only helps if you remember them when your heart is pounding. So commit a few things to memory now.
You have the right to remain silent, and you can say so out loud. You can say that you want to speak with a lawyer. You do not have to answer questions about where you were born or how you entered the country. Do not run, and do not lie, because both can be used against you and can turn a survivable situation into a disaster. If you have your proof of two years of presence, this is the moment it matters, so be ready to show it.
There is one more thing that can change everything. If you are afraid to return to your country, say it clearly. Under the law, expressing a fear of return is supposed to trigger a separate screening interview that pulls you out of the fast track and toward an asylum process. Officers are not always going to invite you to say it. You have to know to say it yourself.
If you want a deeper walkthrough of what to do when officers come to your home, your work, or your courthouse, read our guide on what to do when ICE is at the door.
This is complicated. Complicated is exactly what we do.
Here is the part the fast track is designed to make you forget. Expedited removal is not as automatic as an officer may make it sound. There are real legal questions about whether it even applies to a particular person, whether the two years was properly evaluated, and whether a fear of return was ignored. Those questions can be the difference between a deportation and a day in front of a judge. But they have to be raised fast, often within hours, by someone who knows where to push.
That is the work we have done for twenty years. If you or someone in your family could be exposed to this, do not wait for the knock to find out what your options are. Get your two years of proof together, save our number, and let us look at your situation while there is still room to act. The consultation is free, and we will talk it through in English, Spanish, French, Creole, or Mandarin. You have carried this fear alone long enough.
ලියන ලද්දේ
Joshua Bardavid
I am the principal attorney with years of experience in immigration practice. I have successfully litigated hundreds of immigration cases and have been lead counsel in several precedent-setting appeals. Prior to working as an immigration attorney, I worked as a consultant to the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees. I was editor-in-chief of New York International Law Review and graduated cum laude from St. John's University School of Law. I have lived in Washington D.C., West Africa, and the Middle East. I currently live in New York City. In my spare time, I enjoy travel and adventure, play soccer, and suffer as a Mets fan. I am a member of the American Immigration Lawyers Association (AILA).