What just happened
On June 25, 2026, the Supreme Court decided Mullin v. Doe and removed the last legal barrier protecting Temporary Protected Status (TPS) for people from Haiti and Syria. The Court held that federal judges cannot pause the government's decision to end a TPS designation while that decision is being challenged in court. The orders that had been keeping Haitian and Syrian TPS alive were postponements of the termination dates under 5 U.S.C. section 705, not injunctions, and the Court swept them away. Updated September 17, 2026: TPS for Haiti and Syria has now actually ended. USCIS states that both designations terminated effective July 27, 2026, and that A12 and C19 work permits issued to Haitian and Syrian TPS holders are no longer valid.
If you are Haitian or Syrian, this article is no longer a warning about something ahead of you. Your status ended on July 27, 2026, and today you are about seven weeks into the only window you have left to file for asylum. Read the section on the asylum deadline first, then call a lawyer this week. If you hold TPS from a country that is still designated, you have not lost anything yet, and the rest of this article explains what the Court said, why it reaches far beyond Haiti and Syria, and the concrete steps you can take now.
What the Supreme Court actually decided
TPS is a humanitarian program Congress created in 1990. It lets people from countries torn apart by war or disaster live and work in the United States legally, without fear of deportation, for as long as the designation lasts. Haiti was designated after the 2010 earthquake. Syria was designated in 2012 because of the atrocities of the Assad regime. For many people, that 'temporary' protection has been their legal life here for well over a decade.
The Secretary of Homeland Security moved to terminate both designations. The Federal Register notices set the original end dates at November 21, 2025 for Syria (90 Fed. Reg. 45398) and February 3, 2026 for Haiti (90 Fed. Reg. 54733). Both were postponed by the district courts, and after the Supreme Court ruled, USCIS put the actual terminations at July 27, 2026. TPS holders sued, arguing the terminations were unlawful under the Administrative Procedure Act and, for Haiti, racially motivated. Lower courts had paused the terminations while the lawsuits went forward.
The Supreme Court reversed those pauses. It pointed to a single sentence in the TPS statute, 8 U.S.C. § 1254a(b)(5)(A), which says there is “no judicial review of any determination ... with respect to the designation, or termination or extension of a designation, of a foreign state ...” The Court read those words broadly, but not without limit. It held that the bar reaches every non-constitutional claim, writing that the TPS statute's judicial-review bar 'applies to all non-constitutional claims.' Mullin v. Doe, 609 U.S. ___, Nos. 25-1083 and 25-1084, slip op. at 18 (June 25, 2026). Constitutional claims are a different question, and the Court expressly did not answer it. It declined to decide whether Congress spoke clearly enough to bar those claims too under Webster v. Doe, 486 U.S. 592, 603 (1988), and that portion of the opinion drew only four votes. On the claim that Haiti's termination was driven by race, the Court held only that the challengers were unlikely to prove it and so were not entitled to interim relief. It did not decide that claim on the merits, and Justice Thomas wrote separately to point that out.
Translated out of legalese: when the government decides to end TPS, the courthouse door is largely closed. Congress wrote it that way, and the Court enforced it.
This is not only about Haiti
It would be a mistake to read this as a Haiti story. The same ruling decided the fate of Syrian TPS in the very same opinion. Syrians who have built fourteen years of life here on TPS are in exactly the same position as Haitians today. That is why this article exists in Arabic as well as Creole, and in every language we can reach.
And the logic does not stop at two countries. The Court blessed a reading of the statute that applies to every TPS designation. As the Court described it, this administration 'has terminated every TPS designation that has come up for renewal, 13 in all.' As of September 17, 2026, USCIS still lists El Salvador, Lebanon, Sudan, Ukraine and Venezuela as currently designated, so if your country is one of those you have not lost anything yet. If you hold TPS from any country, the message of this decision is the same. Your status is fragile, the courts are unlikely to rescue it, and the time to build a backup plan is while you still hold status, not after it ends.
The most important thing in this article: your asylum clock
Here is the part that can change everything, and the part people miss until it is too late. If you are afraid to return to your country, you may have a separate, independent right to apply for asylum, but that right comes with a deadline, and losing TPS can start the countdown.
The law normally requires you to apply for asylum within one year of your last arrival in the United States. That is 8 U.S.C. § 1158(a)(2)(B). Most long-time TPS holders are years past that one-year mark, and many assume they have missed their chance. They have not, at least not automatically, because the same statute contains an exception.
Under 8 U.S.C. § 1158(a)(2)(D), the one-year deadline does not apply if you can show 'changed circumstances' affecting your eligibility or 'extraordinary circumstances' that explain the delay. The regulations that put this into practice are 8 C.F.R. § 208.4(a) for cases before USCIS and the identical 8 C.F.R. § 1208.4(a) for cases in immigration court. And those regulations name TPS specifically. 8 C.F.R. § 208.4(a)(5)(iv) treats maintaining Temporary Protected Status as exactly the kind of 'extraordinary circumstance' that excuses the one-year deadline.
Read those pieces together and the danger becomes clear. While you hold TPS, your failure to file for asylum is excused. But the regulation only excuses the delay if you file 'within a reasonable period' after the extraordinary circumstance ends. See 8 C.F.R. § 208.4(a)(5). In plain terms, when your TPS ends and you fall out of status, the clock on your asylum claim may start to run, and you do not have long.
How long is 'a reasonable period'? The statute does not put a number on it, but the government has said in print what it expects. In the preamble to the rule that created this exception, the Department wrote that it 'expects an asylum-seeker to apply as soon as possible after expiration of his or her valid status,' that 'waiting six months or longer after expiration or termination of status would not be considered reasonable,' and that 'shorter periods of time would be considered on a case-by-case basis, with the decision-maker taking into account the totality of the circumstances.' 65 Fed. Reg. 76121, 76124 (Dec. 6, 2000). Read that carefully, because it runs the opposite way from how people usually hear it. Six months is not a generous allowance. It is the point at which the government says the delay is no longer reasonable at all. For a Haitian or Syrian TPS holder whose status ended on July 27, 2026, six months runs out on or about January 27, 2027. Anything shorter than six months is judged case by case on the totality of the circumstances, and adjudicators have rejected delays well short of that. Treat January 2027 as the outer edge of a window that is already open, not as a target to aim at. The earlier you file, the less of this argument you have to make.
The lesson is not to wait and see. If you are Haitian or Syrian and you fear returning home, you are already inside the window and the time to file for asylum is now. If you still hold TPS from another country, file before your status lapses, not in the uncertain window afterward. Filing while you still hold TPS puts you in the strongest position on the one-year deadline, but it does not end the argument by itself. Under 8 C.F.R. section 208.4(a)(5) the burden is on you to show that the circumstances were not intentionally created by your own action or inaction, that they were directly related to your failure to file within the one year, and that the delay was reasonable. Subsection (a)(5)(iv) adds that you must have held TPS 'until a reasonable period before the filing of the asylum application.' Every month you wait makes those harder to prove. There is one more thing to plan around, and almost nobody is told it in advance. Filing for asylum does not give you a work permit. Under 8 C.F.R. section 208.7(a)(1)(i) you cannot even apply for one until 150 days after a complete asylum application has been received, and under (a)(1)(v) none can be issued before the 180th day after you filed. Under (a)(2), any delay you request or cause does not count toward those days, so the wait can stretch well past six months. If your TPS work permit has already expired, build your finances around that gap now. This is exactly why you need to talk to an immigration lawyer without delay.
Treat your status as fragile, and act like it
Whether you are from Haiti, Syria, or any other TPS country, the healthy response to this decision is not panic and is not denial. It is preparation. The people who are ready for what comes next are the ones who used their time to file what could be filed and gather what could be gathered, not the ones who hoped the problem would disappear.
That means getting a full, honest assessment of every option you may have, and many people have more than one. Beyond asylum, you may be eligible for withholding of removal or protection under the Convention Against Torture, for a family-based green card through a spouse, parent, or adult child, for a U visa if you were the victim of a crime, for VAWA if you survived abuse, or for relief none of your friends have heard of. The only way to know is to have someone who does this every day look at your specific facts.
It also means dealing with your work permit. USCIS states that A12 and C19 Employment Authorization Documents issued to Haitian and Syrian TPS holders stopped being valid on July 27, 2026, and that employers completing Form I-9 must reverify and cannot keep employing someone who does not show current work authorization. If your employer has not raised this yet, it is coming. Check whether you hold a separate work permit from another pending case, and talk to a lawyer before you talk to your employer. It also means getting your documents in order, keeping copies of everything that proves how long you have been here and what you have built, and making a plan for your family before there is an emergency rather than during one.
Know your rights if ICE comes to your door
With TPS protection falling away, more people will face the frightening possibility of an encounter with ICE. You have rights, and knowing them in advance is one of the most powerful protective steps you can take. You have the right to remain silent. You do not have to open your door unless an officer shows you a warrant signed by a judge. You have the right to speak to a lawyer.
We wrote a detailed guide on exactly this, and we urge you to read it and share it with your family before you ever need it. Read “ICE at the Door: Know Your Rights in 2026.”
You do not have to figure this out alone
This decision was designed to make you feel powerless, as if the doors are closing and no one is left to fight. That is not the whole truth. The courthouse door for challenging a TPS termination may be narrower now, but the doors to asylum, to other forms of relief, and to a real defense are still open, and the sooner you walk through them the more time there is to prepare what goes with you.
We have spent twenty years representing people in exactly this kind of moment, in the language you think in. If you had TPS from Haiti or Syria, or you hold it from anywhere else, do not wait for the next headline. Talk to us this week, because the deadline in this article is running whether or not anyone tells you about it. The most expensive mistake you can make today is doing nothing.
Written by
Joshua E. Bardavid
Immigration attorney at Bardavid Law, P.C. with years of experience helping clients navigate the U.S. immigration system.