If you were the victim of certain serious crimes in the United States, cooperated with the police or prosecutors, or are willing to, and suffered substantial physical or mental abuse because of what happened to you, you may be eligible to petition for U nonimmigrant status, commonly called the U visa, on Form I-918. Eligibility is only the first step. You also need a law enforcement agency, prosecutor, judge, or another authority with responsibility for investigating or prosecuting the crime to sign a certification confirming your cooperation, and once you file, your case enters a program with three distinct adjudicative processes, Bona Fide Determination review, waiting-list adjudication, and final adjudication, where a petition may go through BFD review or through full waiting-list adjudication before final adjudication, depending on how USCIS handles it, while a strict annual cap on visas keeps hundreds of thousands of petitions pending nationwide. None of that means the door is closed to you. It means the mechanics matter, and this article walks through them as they currently stand.
Who Qualifies: The Statutory Elements
Under 8 U.S.C. § 1101(a)(15)(U), a principal petitioner must show, by a preponderance of the evidence, that they suffered substantial physical or mental abuse as a result of being the victim of a qualifying crime that violated U.S. law or occurred in the United States, that they possess information about that criminal activity, that they have been, are being, or are likely to be helpful to law enforcement in investigating or prosecuting it, and that they are admissible or merit a discretionary waiver of any ground of inadmissibility that applies.
The list of qualifying crimes is long, and it includes offenses such as rape, domestic violence, sexual assault, stalking, kidnapping, felonious assault, extortion, witness tampering, and several others, along with an attempt, conspiracy, or solicitation to commit any of them. If what happened to you does not obviously match one of these labels, that is a question worth bringing to an attorney rather than ruling yourself out on your own; the way a crime is charged or described locally does not always match this federal list word for word.
A principal petitioner who is 21 or older at filing can also petition for a spouse (U-2) and unmarried children under 21 (U-3). A principal petitioner under 21 at filing can additionally petition for parents (U-4) and unmarried siblings under 18 (U-5). The eligibility requirements that apply to the principal petitioner, including the abuse and helpfulness elements, do not apply to these family members. One timing detail matters for spouses in particular: the Ninth Circuit held, in Medina Tovar v. Zuchowski (2020, en banc), that a spousal relationship does not need to exist at the time Form I-918 is filed in order for the spouse to qualify as a U-2, only at the time the case is adjudicated, and USCIS has adopted that holding nationwide as a matter of policy.
Certification: What Form I-918, Supplement B Actually Requires
For a petition to be found bona fide under the BFD process, USCIS's Bona Fide Determination guidance requires a complete and properly filed certification, Form I-918 Supplement B, submitted within six months of the certifying official's signature.
It is worth being direct about what this requirement is not. Certification is controlled by the certifying agency itself, not by the strength of your case alone, and the federal materials we reviewed do not establish that a qualifying applicant is automatically entitled to a certifying official's signature. USCIS has committed to granting U nonimmigrant status once a petitioner satisfies the statutory criteria, but obtaining the certification in the first place is a separate step, and a certifying agency's later withdrawal of a signed Supplement B can affect a case even after it has been filed. As of this writing, the chapter of the USCIS Policy Manual specifically reserved for certification documentation and evidence, Volume 3, Part C, Chapter 3, is marked as reserved and contains no substantive guidance; the certification mechanics described here instead come from the regulation itself and from the Policy Manual's eligibility, bona fide determination, and waiting list chapters.
Three Processes After You File: Bona Fide Determination, the Waiting List, and Final Adjudication
Congress capped U-1 visas and grants of U-1 status at 10,000 per fiscal year for principal petitioners; family members are not counted against that cap. That cap was reached every fiscal year from 2010 through 2025, and USCIS now describes the U-visa program as involving three distinct adjudicative processes: Bona Fide Determination review and waiting-list adjudication, which both operate while a visa number is not yet available, and final adjudication, when USCIS actually issues a visa drawn from the annual cap.
The older mechanism is the waiting list. Under 8 C.F.R. § 214.14(d)(2), every eligible petitioner who is not granted U-1 status solely because the cap has been reached must be placed on a waiting list and given written notice of that placement. While on the waiting list, a petitioner and qualifying family members receive deferred action or parole, and USCIS may, at its discretion, authorize employment for them. Placement on the waiting list requires a full eligibility adjudication, the same kind of review a final decision would require, and USCIS may issue a Request for Evidence or a Notice of Intent to Deny during that process. According to USCIS's own Policy Manual, petitioners placed on the waiting list are generally approved once a visa number becomes available, but approval is not guaranteed, and a petition can still be denied if the certifying agency withdraws its Supplement B after waiting-list placement.
The newer mechanism, the Bona Fide Determination process, was created on June 14, 2021, and applies to petitions that were pending on or filed after that date. USCIS created it, by its own account, because of a growing backlog awaiting placement on the waiting list or final adjudication. Under the BFD process, USCIS first determines whether a petition is bona fide, meaning a complete and properly filed Form I-918 Supplement B submitted within six months of the certifier's signature, together with a personal statement describing the victimization and completed background and security checks. If the petition is bona fide, USCIS separately exercises its discretion over whether the petitioner poses a risk to national security or public safety and otherwise merits a favorable exercise of discretion. A petition can clear the bona fide step and still not receive a BFD grant. On August 11, 2023, USCIS extended this process so that a qualifying family member's petition can be found bona fide, and their Form I-765 adjudicated, once the principal petitioner receives a BFD, even if the principal has not yet filed their own Form I-765.
BFD review and waiting-list adjudication are not the same thing, and USCIS's own guidance is explicit that the BFD process does not include the full eligibility analysis that waiting-list placement does; a petitioner found not bona fide during BFD review is instead routed into full waiting-list adjudication. A BFD grant produces an employment authorization document and deferred action, but USCIS describes that grant plainly: it does not guarantee eligibility for U nonimmigrant status. A separate determination, that a petitioner will not receive a BFD EAD, is not a denial of the underlying Form I-918; USCIS treats non-issuance of a BFD EAD as not a final agency action, and does not accept or process motions to reopen or reconsider, appeals, or requests to re-apply for one. USCIS also reserves the right to revoke a BFD-based EAD and terminate the associated deferred action at any time, including if a certifier withdraws the underlying Supplement B. When a visa number finally becomes available in a given fiscal year, in the program's third process, final adjudication, USCIS draws from both BFD recipients and waitlisted petitioners in strict order of filing date, with the oldest petitions receiving priority.
What the Current Numbers Actually Show
As of the end of Fiscal Year 2026's third quarter (April through June 2026), according to USCIS's own published Form I-918 data, queried by its Chief Data and Analytics Office in July 2026, 288,243 principal petitions and 191,871 family-member petitions were pending, for a combined 480,114 pending petitions. In the first three quarters of FY2026, USCIS received 28,987 new principal petitions, approved 8,006, and denied 3,220. Over that same period, USCIS granted a Bona Fide Determination EAD and deferred action to 12,023 principal petitioners and found 6,165 principal petitioners bona-fide-ineligible, routing them to full waiting-list adjudication instead; among family members, 7,101 were granted a BFD and 4,772 were found ineligible.
On the question everyone actually wants answered, how long this takes, the honest answer is that no current, official, single figure covering the whole process from filing to final approval exists in any source we reviewed. USCIS's own 2021 report found that in 2019 it took an average of 41.5 months just to decide whether a petitioner should be placed on the waiting list, but that figure predates the BFD process entirely and measures only one step, not the whole case. As of the U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services Form I-918 page's own last-updated date, June 5, 2026, and independently confirmed inside a federal appellate opinion decided September 14, 2026, USCIS had announced that it met the fiscal year 2025 cap as of September 9, 2025, and that when fiscal year 2026 began on October 1, 2025, it resumed final approvals starting with eligible principal petitions filed on or before April 30, 2017, working in strict filing-date order. That is USCIS's own dated statement, current as of June 5, 2026 and independently confirmed as quoted inside the September 14, 2026 appellate opinion. It is not the same thing as a number of years a person filing today should expect to wait, and no source located for this article supports converting it into one.
That September 2026 appellate decision, from the Ninth Circuit, also confirmed something worth knowing even though the case does not bind New York, which sits in the Second Circuit: granting parole to a waitlisted U-visa petitioner is discretionary, not something USCIS is required to do. On a related question the Ninth Circuit's decision did not resolve, at least one other federal appeals court, the Sixth Circuit, has taken the position that placing a petitioner on the waiting list itself is not discretionary under the current regulation.
The pending-petition and Bona Fide Determination numbers above reflect USCIS data queried in July 2026, and the April 30, 2017 filing-date cutoff reflects USCIS's statement current as of June 5, 2026, confirmed as quoted inside the September 14, 2026 appellate opinion described above, decided nine days before this article's September 23, 2026 research date. Cap status and filing-date cutoffs may change, particularly around the close of a fiscal year, and this area of the law is actively moving. Confirm the current figures and case status with USCIS or an attorney before relying on them.
What a Pending Petition, a BFD Grant, or Waiting-List Placement Does Not Do
None of these statuses stops removal proceedings on their own. In February 2026, the Board of Immigration Appeals held, in Matter of Ibarra-Vega, that administrative closure over the government's objection is inappropriate when a U visa is not immediately available to a respondent and the record does not establish that one is likely to become available in the reasonably near future. And in June 2025, a federal district court in Washington denied a preliminary injunction against removal sought by a petitioner who already held BFD-based deferred action and a BFD employment authorization document, finding that he had not shown he was being treated differently from other petitioners in the same backlog.
A continuance in removal proceedings is a separate, narrower tool, and it is not automatic either. The Board of Immigration Appeals held in Matter of Sanchez Sosa (2012) that an immigration judge deciding whether to continue proceedings for someone with a pending U-visa petition should weigh the government's response to the request, whether the underlying petition is prima facie approvable, which ordinarily requires an approved certification, and the reasons for the request along with other procedural factors. A prima facie approvable petition will ordinarily support a continuance for a reasonable period, according to the Board, but "ordinarily" is not "always," and whether to seek one, and when, is a decision that depends on the specific record in a given case.
Getting Legitimate Help With Your Case
Because certification depends on a certifying official's signature, and because a U-visa case moves through several discretionary federal processes, it is worth independently verifying the credentials of anyone you pay for help with your case before you sign anything they prepare for you.
Frequently Asked Questions
What crimes actually qualify someone for a U visa? The statute lists specific categories, including rape, domestic violence, sexual assault, stalking, kidnapping, felonious assault, extortion, witness tampering, and several others, along with any attempt, conspiracy, or solicitation to commit them. If what happened to you does not clearly fit one of the listed categories by name, that is a question for an attorney rather than something to decide on your own, since how a crime was charged locally does not always track the federal list exactly.
What is the difference between the Bona Fide Determination process and the waiting list? The Bona Fide Determination process, created in 2021, is a narrower discretionary review: USCIS checks for a complete and properly filed Form I-918, Supplement B, the required personal statement, and completed background and security checks, and separately considers whether you pose a public safety or national security concern, without conducting the full eligibility review a final decision requires. A petition found not bona fide is instead routed into the waiting list's full eligibility adjudication, which includes the possibility of a Request for Evidence or a Notice of Intent to Deny and leads toward final adjudication once a visa number is available. A petition can receive a BFD grant and still be awaiting final adjudication, and a BFD grant is not a decision on the underlying U-visa petition itself; when a visa number becomes available, USCIS draws for final adjudication from both BFD recipients and waitlisted petitioners in strict filing-date order.
How long does it currently take to get a U visa? No current, official figure covering the full process from filing to final approval exists in any source we reviewed for this article. The most recent public benchmark, per a USCIS statement current as of June 5, 2026 and independently confirmed inside a federal appellate opinion decided September 14, 2026, is a filing-date cutoff, not a wait-time estimate: USCIS said it was approving eligible principal petitions filed on or before April 30, 2017, in strict filing-date order. That cutoff may change as USCIS resumes approvals and updates its published information, and it should be confirmed directly with USCIS or an attorney rather than assumed.
Does a pending U-visa petition, or a Bona Fide Determination grant, protect someone from detention or removal? Not by itself. USCIS's own guidance states that a BFD grant does not guarantee eligibility for U nonimmigrant status and can be revoked at any time. The Board of Immigration Appeals has held that administrative closure of removal proceedings over the government's objection is inappropriate when a U visa is not immediately available to a respondent and the record does not establish that one is likely to become available in the reasonably near future, and a federal district court has denied preliminary relief against removal to a petitioner who already held BFD-based deferred action, finding he had not shown different treatment from other petitioners in the same backlog. A continuance in removal proceedings is possible and, for a prima facie approvable petition, is ordinarily favored, but it is an individualized, discretionary decision, not an automatic one.
Can I get work authorization while my case is pending? It is possible but discretionary at every stage, not automatic. USCIS may authorize employment for petitioners and qualifying family members on the waiting list, and a BFD grant includes its own employment authorization document. Neither is guaranteed, and a BFD-based work authorization can be revoked, including if the certifying agency withdraws the underlying certification.
How do I make sure the person helping me with a U-visa case is legitimate? Before paying someone for help with a U-visa case, or signing anything they prepare for you, independently verify that the person is authorized to provide immigration legal help.
What We Do From Here
A U-visa case turns on specific facts: what happened to you, what a certifying agency is willing to document, and where your petition sits in a backlog reflected in USCIS's periodically updated data. We review whether your situation fits the statutory categories, help prepare the personal statement and supporting evidence for submission to the certifying agency and USCIS, and help you understand, honestly, what a Bona Fide Determination grant or waiting-list placement does and does not do for your case and your family. We cannot control whether a police department or prosecutor signs a certification, and we cannot promise a timeline or an outcome that depends on USCIS's own discretion. What we can do is help prepare and present your petition based on the available facts and evidence, and make sure you understand each stage as it happens.
If you were the victim of a crime and are not sure whether you qualify for a U visa, or you already have a pending petition and want to understand what your Bona Fide Determination or waiting-list status actually means, contact us. Bring your police reports, any Form I-918 Supplement B you already have, and any notices USCIS has sent you, so we can see the full picture from the start.
ලියන ලද්දේ
Joshua Bardavid
I am the principal attorney with years of experience in immigration practice. I have successfully litigated hundreds of immigration cases and have been lead counsel in several precedent-setting appeals. Prior to working as an immigration attorney, I worked as a consultant to the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees. I was editor-in-chief of New York International Law Review and graduated cum laude from St. John's University School of Law. I have lived in Washington D.C., West Africa, and the Middle East. I currently live in New York City. In my spare time, I enjoy travel and adventure, play soccer, and suffer as a Mets fan. I am a member of the American Immigration Lawyers Association (AILA).