Back to Blog
Asylum

The Annual Asylum Fee Is Real Again. Your Work Permit Dies If You Do Not Pay.

A federal court did stay the Annual Asylum Fee on October 30, 2025. The same court lifted that stay on February 2, 2026. The fee is back. USCIS has been collecting since February. The new April 29, 2026 Federal Register rule sets May 29, 2026 as the effective date. If you do not pay within 30 days of your individual USCIS notice, USCIS will reject your asylum application, terminate your work permit, and may put you into removal. Here is who has to pay, who does not, the buried one-year-bar trap inside a "rejected" I-589, and where federal court may still be relevant.

Joshua BardavidMay 8, 202611 min readUpdated June 27, 2026

If you have an asylum application pending, USCIS is going to send you a letter, or already has. The letter will demand that you pay a $102 Annual Asylum Fee. The letter will give you thirty days. If you do not pay in thirty days, USCIS will reject your asylum application, terminate your work permit, and may put you into removal proceedings.

That is not a threat. That is the new rule that took effect May 29, 2026.

You may have heard, on Spanish-language Facebook, in your church group, or from a friend, that a court blocked this fee. That was true. It is no longer true. A federal court in Maryland did stay the fee on October 30, 2025. The same court lifted that stay on February 2, 2026. The fee is back. USCIS has been collecting since February. The notices you are getting in the mail are real, they are lawful as of today, and ignoring them costs you the asylum case you have been working on for years.

This post explains what the fee is, who has to pay, what the consequences of not paying actually look like, the narrow group of people who do not have to pay, and the federal-court angles that may still be available. It is calendar-bound. If you got a notice, you have thirty days from the date of the notice. If you have not gotten one yet, you almost certainly will.

What is the Annual Asylum Fee

The Annual Asylum Fee, or AAF, is a new $102 charge that asylum applicants must pay to USCIS every year while their asylum application is pending. It was created by H.R.1, the budget reconciliation bill that President Trump signed on July 4, 2025. The fee is codified in section 100009 of Pub. L. 119-21 and at 8 U.S.C. § 1808. The base amount is $100. USCIS adjusted it to $102 for fiscal year 2026 to account for inflation.

The fee is annual. It is per application, not per person — a single payment covers the principal applicant and any derivative spouse or children listed on the I-589. It is triggered on the 365-day anniversary of an I-589 filed on or after October 1, 2024, and on every anniversary after that while the application is pending. So if you filed your I-589 in November 2024, your first anniversary was November 2025, and you should expect a notice in your mail.

The lawsuit was real. The order is gone.

We are repeating this because the misinformation is causing real harm.

On October 3, 2025, the Asylum Seeker Advocacy Project, or ASAP, filed a class-action lawsuit in the United States District Court for the District of Maryland challenging the fee. The case is ASAP v. USCIS. On October 30, 2025, the district court partially granted ASAP’s motion for a preliminary injunction. The court temporarily stayed the USCIS Federal Register Notice and the EOIR memo that implemented the fee. For three months, USCIS could not collect.

On February 2, 2026, the same court granted the government’s motion to lift the stay and denied ASAP’s motion for a preliminary injunction. The fee was reinstated. USCIS has been sending notices and collecting since February. ASAP’s lawsuit is still pending in the District of Maryland on the merits, but the preliminary injunction is gone. There is no active court order blocking the fee for the general asylum-applicant population.

That means that the notices arriving in the mail right now are valid notices. The thirty-day clock that runs from the date of the notice is a real clock. The consequences are real consequences. Anyone telling you otherwise is repeating news from October that has been overtaken by events.

Why May 29, 2026 matters

On April 29, 2026, the Department of Homeland Security published an Interim Final Rule in the Federal Register at 91 Fed. Reg. 22952. The rule, FR Doc 2026-08333, codifies the Annual Asylum Fee, the consequences of nonpayment, and several other H.R.1 fee provisions in the Code of Federal Regulations. The rule’s effective date is May 29, 2026.

May 29 is not a single, universal deadline for every asylum applicant. The thirty-day clock runs from the date of each applicant’s personal USCIS notice. May 29 is the date the consequences of nonpayment become operative for everyone whose thirty-day window has run.

The rule is an Interim Final Rule, which means it took effect without going through the standard notice-and-comment process. The comment period is open through June 29, 2026. The rule is potentially subject to Administrative Procedure Act challenges, both for bypassing notice and comment under 5 U.S.C. § 553 and as arbitrary and capricious under 5 U.S.C. § 706. We will say more about that at the end of this post. For now, treat the May 29 effective date as real and act accordingly.

What happens if you do not pay

USCIS has been explicit, both in the IFR and in a public alert titled "DHS Announces Consequences for Unpaid Annual Asylum Fees, Unveils New H.R. 1 Requirements." The consequences are stacked. They are not theoretical.

  • USCIS will reject your pending I-589 asylum application. Not deny. Reject. The distinction matters and we explain it below.
  • USCIS will deny your pending I-765 application for an Employment Authorization Document, also known as a work permit, that was based on the asylum application.
  • If you already have an approved EAD card in your wallet, USCIS will terminate your work authorization. The card itself stops being valid. This is one of the most surprising and most important consequences. Many people assume that an existing card stays valid until its expiration date. That is not the rule under the IFR. Existing EAD validity terminates upon nonpayment.
  • If you do not have any other lawful immigration status, USCIS may issue you a Notice to Appear and refer you to immigration court for removal proceedings.

The trap inside the trap is the difference between rejection and denial. A rejected I-589 generally does not toll the one-year asylum filing deadline. The one-year deadline under 8 U.S.C. § 1158(a)(2)(B) requires that you file for asylum within one year of your last entry into the United States, with limited exceptions for changed or extraordinary circumstances. If your asylum application is rejected for nonpayment, and you try to refile later, the government may take the position that your refiled application is barred because more than one year has passed since your entry. People who have been here for years, whose asylum applications have been pending for years, can be functionally locked out of asylum entirely if their application is rejected for nonpayment of a $102 fee. That is the buried risk.

Who has to pay, and who does not

Anyone who has a pending Form I-589 with USCIS or the immigration court that has been pending for at least 365 days is subject to the fee. If you have been on the asylum docket for years, you are subject to the fee. If you filed in 2024 or 2025 and your case is pending, your first anniversary is approaching or has already passed.

There is one significant carve-out. On February 5, 2026, USCIS paused collection of all H.R.1 fees, including the AAF, for members of the Ms. L. Settlement Class and their Qualifying Additional Family Members. That carve-out comes from Ms. L. v. ICE, No. 18-cv-00428 (S.D. Cal.).

The Ms. L. class covers families who were apprehended together at the United States border with Mexico and separated by the federal government between January 20, 2017 and January 20, 2021. The settlement was finally approved on December 11, 2023. If you were separated from your child or your parent at the border during that window, or you are a Qualifying Additional Family Member of someone who was, you may not have to pay. Notices issued before February 5, 2026 to class members and Qualifying Additional Family Members were rescinded.

If you think you might be in the Ms. L. class, do not pay before getting that question answered. The Department of Justice maintains a Legal Services for Ms. L. Class page through the Executive Office for Immigration Review. The website together.gov has additional information. If you are uncertain, call us, call ASAP, or call CLINIC. Do not pay first and try to get reimbursed later.

How to pay if you do have to pay

USCIS only takes the AAF online. Payment is made through the USCIS payment portal at my.uscis.gov, in the Annual Asylum Fee section. The portal accepts credit cards, debit cards, and ACH bank transfers. It does not accept checks or money orders. You will need your A-number and your I-589 receipt number.

You should pay before your thirty days run. We recommend paying within the first two weeks of receiving the notice. The portal can have outages, processing can be delayed, and you do not want a technical problem to result in a rejection of your asylum case.

Paying does not waive your right to challenge the fee. If a future court order invalidates the AAF or the IFR, the position of practitioners is generally that paid fees should be refunded to people who paid under protest. Pay first, fight second. Do not roll the dice on a court ruling that may not come.

If your work permit was just terminated

If you missed a notice, paid late, or only learned about the fee from your employer, your EAD card may already be invalid. Here is what to do.

First, log into your USCIS online account and check the status of your case. Look for any AAF notices that came through the portal. If a notice exists and the thirty days have run, document the date the notice was issued and the date you saw it. Pay the fee immediately even if you are past the thirty days. Late payment may not save the case, but it will preserve some arguments for reinstatement.

Second, do not keep working on a card you know to be invalid. Working without authorization can create separate immigration problems and can hurt the asylum claim itself if it ever gets reinstated. Tell your employer the truth, take the unpaid leave you can, and apply for new work authorization through whatever path is available to you.

Third, consider a motion to reopen if your asylum case has been rejected. The motion has to argue, at minimum, that the rejection was procedurally improper, that you have paid or will immediately pay, and that the equities favor reinstatement. We have started filing these. The case law is being made right now.

Where federal court may still be relevant

The April 29, 2026 Interim Final Rule is fresh. It bypassed standard notice-and-comment rulemaking, citing the good-cause exception in 5 U.S.C. § 553(b)(B). Whether that good-cause invocation will hold up under judicial scrutiny is an open question. Several theories of attack are circulating among practitioners and we expect to see them tested.

  • APA challenge to the IFR for failure to follow notice-and-comment procedures and for arbitrary and capricious decision-making.
  • Procedural due process challenge to the consequence stack — terminating an existing EAD, rejecting a pending asylum application, and triggering removal — without a meaningful pre-deprivation hearing on hardship or ability to pay.
  • Eighth Amendment Excessive Fines Clause challenge in cases where the AAF, combined with new H.R.1 filing fees and EAD fees, has the effect of a punitive financial barrier to asylum, especially after Timbs v. Indiana, 586 U.S. 146 (2019).
  • As-applied due process challenges where USCIS notice procedures fail — for example, where notice was sent to a stale address through no fault of the applicant, where ESL applicants were not provided language access, or where the thirty-day clock was triggered without actual receipt of notice.

None of those theories has won yet. ASAP’s preliminary injunction was denied. But the IFR is new, the comment period is open through June 29, 2026, and litigation in this space is moving fast. If you have a particularly strong hardship case, or if your EAD was terminated under circumstances that suggest a notice failure, federal court may be a real avenue. That is the kind of case Bardavid Law handles. It is not the kind of case a volume firm has the bandwidth to litigate.

Bottom line

Pay the fee unless you are confident you fall within the Ms. L. carve-out. Do not assume the October 2025 stay is still in place. It is not. Open every USCIS letter the day it arrives. Pay within the first two weeks of receiving any AAF notice. If your EAD has already been terminated or your asylum application has already been rejected, call us today. The reinstatement and federal-court paths exist, but they get harder with every day that passes.

You have spent years building this case. Do not lose it for $102.

If you got a notice and do not know what to do, contact Bardavid Law. We will tell you the truth about your options, including the truth that you may simply need to pay. We will save the federal-court conversation for the cases that actually call for it.

Written by

Joshua Bardavid

I am the principal attorney with years of experience in immigration practice. I have successfully litigated hundreds of immigration cases and have been lead counsel in several precedent-setting appeals. Prior to working as an immigration attorney, I worked as a consultant to the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees. I was editor-in-chief of New York International Law Review and graduated cum laude from St. John's University School of Law. I have lived in Washington D.C., West Africa, and the Middle East. I currently live in New York City. In my spare time, I enjoy travel and adventure, play soccer, and suffer as a Mets fan. I am a member of the American Immigration Lawyers Association (AILA).

Share:

Got a Letter You Don't Understand?

Stop Googling at 2am. Let's look at it together and figure out what it actually means.

Let's Talk About It